How Lumino's benchmark dataset is built, what it covers, and how figures are derived.
Lumino's benchmark dataset covers 100 global fashion and apparel companies representing $0B in combined annual revenue and an estimated $0.0B in combined IT spend. These companies were selected to represent the full spectrum of business models in the industry β from vertically integrated fast fashion to luxury outerwear, pure-play e-commerce to value retail β giving Lumino users a meaningful and diverse peer comparison. The full company list is available in Benchmark Explorer.
Lumino classifies all 100 companies into seven business model categories. IT spend intensity varies systematically across these categories β driven by digital channel mix, supply chain complexity, and technology as a competitive differentiator.
High-velocity trend-to-shelf retailers. IT investment focused on demand forecasting, supply chain speed, and RFID. Inditex is an outlier at the top due to proprietary AWS platform.
Quality-led mid-to-upper market brands. DTC + wholesale mix. IT investment in CRM, AUR optimisation, and selective digital channels.
Ultra-premium brands. IT spend elevated by clienteling platforms, bespoke e-commerce, and digital exclusivity tools. Hermès is deliberately below baseline (no mass digital channel).
Performance and lifestyle athletic. Heaviest digital investment outside pure-play e-commerce β Nike app, SNKRS, training platforms, and DTC data infrastructure.
Online-only or online-dominant. Technology is the product. Platform engineering, logistics automation, AI personalisation, and seller tools drive structurally elevated IT intensity.
Department stores, off-price, and multi-brand specialty. Store-heavy, IT investment in inventory management, supply chain, and omnichannel. TJX at the low end (no e-commerce).
Lowest IT intensity. Store-only or minimal digital. IT focused on buying systems and store operations β consumer-facing digital investment close to zero.
For each of the 17 core companies in Lumino's detailed dataset, a consistent set of financial and operational data points is available at three levels of geographic granularity: global, regional, and market (country). The remaining 83 companies in the benchmark dataset provide company-level data only.
The number of active markets varies by company. Inditex has data across 30+ countries. Aritzia covers US and Canada only. A country appears in the dataset only if that company has meaningful commercial operations there.
Revenue figures at global and regional level are sourced directly from each company's most recent annual report or SEC filing (10-K for US-listed companies, 20-F for foreign private issuers, and local equivalents for European companies). Regional breakdowns follow each company's own reporting segments β for example, Inditex reports into Spain, Europe ex-Spain, Americas, and Asia/Rest of World; lululemon reports Americas, China Mainland, and Rest of World. Where a company's reporting segments do not align exactly with Lumino's five-region model (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia), figures are reclassified using the geographic definitions standard in the industry.
All revenue figures are converted to USD at the average exchange rate for the relevant fiscal year. EUR/USD 1.08, GBP/USD 1.27, CAD/USD 0.74, CHF/USD 1.12, SEK/USD 0.095 were the primary rates applied.
Unlike revenue, IT spend is rarely disclosed as a standalone line item in fashion company financial reports. Lumino's IT spend figures are estimated using a layered benchmarking approach.
The foundation is the McKinsey State of Fashion Technology report (2022, updated with 2024 trajectory data), which established that fashion companies invested 1.6β1.8% of revenues in technology in 2021, trending toward 3.0β3.5% by 2030. For FY2024, Lumino uses a baseline range of 1.8β2.2% for traditional retailers, with adjustments applied for business model.
HG Insights retail technology data (2024) provided category split benchmarks: IT Services (labor) 44% of total IT spend, Software 28%, Hardware/Communications (Other) 28%. These splits are adjusted for digital maturity β DTC-led companies carry a higher labor and software share.
Gartner IT Key Metrics Data (retail vertical) provided cross-validation for IT spend intensity ranges and category mix.
A flat benchmark is not appropriate across a peer set that spans Primark (no e-commerce, store-only) to Shein (technology company that manufactures fashion). Lumino applies the following directional adjustments:
| Business model | Adjustment | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Pure-play e-commerce (Zalando, ASOS, Shein) | +0.8% to +1.2% | Technology is the product; platform, logistics, and engineering costs are structurally elevated |
| DTC-first premium (lululemon, On Running, Aritzia) | +0.4% to +0.8% | Heavy investment in app, personalisation, and owned digital channels |
| Luxury / ultra-premium (Burberry, Moncler, LVMH) | +0.1% to +0.2% | Digital innovation leadership but smaller revenue base amplifies % |
| Active digital transformation (Hugo Boss CLAIM 5, H&M) | +0.1% to +0.3% | Disclosed transformation programmes justify above-median IT intensity |
| Store-only / value (Primark, Ross Stores) | β0.5% to β0.6% | Structural absence of e-commerce eliminates a major IT cost category |
| Standard multi-brand / wholesale (PVH, Gap, Ralph Lauren) | 0% | At or near peer median |
Country revenue figures are estimated from regional totals using store count data, disclosed country-level figures, and proportional allocation based on market size and brand presence. Country-level IT spend is calculated by applying the global IT% to the country revenue figure β a simplification that provides a consistent and comparable baseline.
We report each company's IT spend as a single global figure β not split by region or country. No company discloses its IT budget broken down by geography, so any such split would be invented: false precision dressed up as detail. Revenue is different. Where a company genuinely reports revenue by segment we carry those segments through; IT spend, we don't, because the disclosure to support it doesn't exist.
How we arrive at the global figure depends on what the company discloses. When it reports its IT or technology spend directly, we read it from the filing (Reported). When it discloses something we can reason from β a cost breakdown that implies it β we derive it and label it as such (Inferred). When it discloses nothing, we estimate from public-source sector benchmarks, adjusted for the company's business model β a stated assumption that, say, a luxury house and a value retailer don't spend alike, not a measurement β and say plainly the number is modelled (Modelled). Where even a grounded estimate isn't possible, we decline to publish a figure rather than guess.
Nothing reaches you unreviewed: every figure passes a person before it's published. How much trust each tier earns, and how it rolls into a company's score, is set out in full on the DQI methodology page.
Every figure in Lumino carries a provenance label β not just a number, but a record of where that number came from and how much trust it deserves. The Data Quality Index (DQI) turns that provenance into a single 0β100 score you can compare across companies and watch improve as you add your own verified data.
Two companies can show identical IT spend percentages while drawing on very different evidence bases. One figure might come from a published annual report with explicit IT disclosure; another might be modelled from a peer median. The DQI makes that difference visible so you can calibrate how much weight to place on each comparison.
You have entered and verified this figure directly. It reflects your company's own records, overriding any published or modelled estimate.
Sourced from a public annual report, SEC filing, earnings call, or official press release. Direct disclosure, explicitly stated.
Derived from related public disclosures β for example, backing out IT spend from a cost-breakdown disclosure that doesn't name it explicitly.
Estimated using industry benchmark models and peer group comparisons. Reasonable, but the least precise.
The DQI is not a flat average. It weights evidence along two axes β geographic level and field importance β then combines them into a single score.
If a level is absent (no regional data filed), its weight is redistributed proportionally to the levels that are present. A global-only company scores against 100% global weight, not penalised for data that doesn't exist to collect.
Within each level, fields are further weighted by decision relevance. Revenue and IT spend percentage β the figures most directly used in benchmarking β carry the most weight. Category splits (labour, software, other) and internal allocation ratios carry less, because they are rarely disclosed and their absence is the norm rather than the exception.
| Score | Band | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| 91β100 | Fully verified | Near-complete public disclosure. Benchmark comparisons are highly reliable. |
| 71β90 | Mostly verified | Strong public evidence base. Most key figures come from official filings. |
| 41β70 | Partially verified | Mix of reported and inferred data. Directionally sound; some estimation involved. |
| 0β40 | Benchmark estimates | Primarily modelled from industry benchmarks. Use as a starting point, not a precise figure. |
IT spend as a percentage of revenue is a calculated field β derived live as IT spend (USD) Γ· revenue Γ 100. It is displayed throughout the platform for readability but is never scored independently by the DQI. Scoring it separately would double-count the same underlying evidence already captured by the revenue and IT spend figures. Calculated fields carry a grey Ζ Calculated badge in the Data Foundations page.
Registered companies can enter their own figures directly in the Data Foundations page. Any field you verify with a source link moves from Modelled (25) or Inferred (55) to Verified by you (100), immediately raising your DQI. The biggest gains come from confirming global IT spend (USD) β it accounts for roughly 29% of the global sub-score.
If you have questions about how a specific figure was derived, want to discuss the methodology, or believe a figure should be updated based on new public information, we want to hear from you.
Get in touchAll figures are estimates based on publicly available information and industry benchmarks. Lumino does not have access to any company's internal financial data. IT spend figures in particular are estimates and should be treated as indicative rather than precise. Revenue figures are sourced from public filings and are accurate to the best of our knowledge.